Selamat Hari Raya: Maaf Zahir Batin

Farish A Noor Publications. A must find collection

• From Indrapura to Darul Makmur: A Deconstructive History of Pahang. (Silverfish Books, Kuala Lumpur, 2010.)

• What Your Teacher Didn't Tell You (The Annexe Lectures, Vol. 1) (Matahari Books, Petaling Jaya, 2009)

• Quran and Cricket: Travels Through the Madrasahs of Asia and Other Stories. (Silverfish Books, Kuala Lumpur, 2009)

• Di Balik Malaysia Dari Majapahit Ke Putrajaya (ZI Publications, KL, 2008)

• Islam Embedded: The Historical Development of the Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party PAS 1951-2003 (MSRI, Kuala Lumpur, 2004)

• The Madrasah in Asia: Political Activism and Transnational Linkages (University of Amsterdam press, 2008)

• Writings on the War on Terror, Global Media Publications, New Delhi, 2006.

• Crosscurrents: Alternative Voices in Our Changing Times. Marshall Cavendish-Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 2006.

• From Majapahit to Putrajaya: Searching For Another Malaysia. Silverfish Books, Kuala Lumpur, 2005.

• Islam Progresif: Peluang, Tentangan dan Masa Depannya di Asia Tenggara. SAMHA, Jogjakarta, 2005.

• Farish A. Noor: "Islam", in: Frank-Jürgen Richter, Pamela Mar: Asia’s New Crisis, John Wiley & Sons, Singapore, 2004 (see Amazon)

• Di San Zhi Yan Kan Ma Lai Xi Ya (Chinese edition of The Other Malaysia). Sin Chew Jit Poh Press, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, 2004.

• The Other Malaysia: Writings on Malaysia's Subaltern History, Silverfish Books, Kuala Lumpur, 2002

• Terrorising the Truth, The Shaping of Contemporary Images of Islam and Muslims in Media, Politics and Culture (JUST world press, Kuala Lumpur, 1998)

Still dreaming of a Malaysia to call Home — Farish A. Noor

August 12, 2011

AUG 12 — A Malaysian ambassador once asked me if, after living and working abroad for more than 2½ decades, I still kept my Malaysian citizenship. And I answered yes. He was surprised somewhat and added: “Thank God, at least we haven’t lost you as well.” I replied: “Well, we have lost so many good academics and professionals by now I’m not sure if that makes any difference by this stage...”

Yet out of some naïveté on my part I would still state that I believe in the Malaysian project, for all its quirks and shortcomings. And now, as Malaysia looks ahead at a decade that will undoubtedly transform the face of Southeast Asia and will witness the gradual decline of American influence and the rise of China’s in Asean, we hold fast to the ship of state that is due for a severe battering as never before.

While the inflow and outflow of foreign capital investment FDI in and out of Asean will radically re-draw the political boundaries of the region and lead to the rise of new growth centres and the decline of old ones, our national politics is dominated by horror stories, amok stories, bomoh stories and of course the motley crew of communitarian heroes and ethnic champions who care only about their own respective ethno-religious communities.

Every ethno-racial demagogue talks about having to champion the cause of “his people”; regardless of the fact that “his people” may not have appointed him to that task. Oppositional dialectics rules the roost as identities are configured in exclusive oppositional terms time and again: us against them, in-group versus out-group. This has been the mottled landscape of our national consciousness since independence, and we still cannot get out of this narrow and blinkered mode of thinking.

During my long sojourn abroad, I constantly met Malaysians who could discard and/or transcend their limited ethnic confines while overseas, for there they are Malaysians. Yet it seems as if a spell has been cast upon all of us, for as soon as we step back into Malaysia the first question that comes to our lips is: What race are you?

As someone who has researched across South and Southeast Asia for more than 12 years, I am struck by this peculiar habit of ours: in India and Indonesia — two countries I love as much as Malaysia — no one has ever asked me that question. And indeed, in both countries I often pass as a local and the case is closed. Few attempts, if ever, are made to locate me in the ethnic landscape of the country. Nobody asks what race I am, which religion I belong to, etc. Why?

I refuse to believe that Malaysians are condemned by history or genetics to remain in the rut that we have built for ourselves. There is nothing biologically unique about us as to condemn us to such narrow solipsism for eternity. And if we Malaysians can transcend narrow ethnic and religious compartmentalisation abroad, why can’t we do it at home?

Which brings me to the subject of home, and homeliness. “Home” is where we are meant to be happy and content; safe and assured; comfortable and at ease with ourselves. Home is where we need not wear our identities on our sleeves, or as armour to protect ourselves from whatever hostile influences there may be without. And if Malaysia is home to us, then it ought to be the one place on this God’s earth where we can be ourselves without having to apologise for it.

Yet the divisive nature of our communitarian politics has robbed us all of this sense of comfort and homeliness, for it seems that comfort can no longer be shared among all Malaysians, our fellow citizens. The comfort zones of each community has become something sacrosanct, thanks to the politicking of the various parties and politicians of the country, who continue to harp on the need to first protect, and then to expand, the respective comfort zones of their exclusive communities.

As a result, the boundaries of these different comfort zones are bound to clash, and the result is the antagonism we see everywhere in the media today: Harassment of intellectuals and non-partisan articulators; scare-mongering campaigns about how the “Other” is about to undermine “Us”; rumours of plots and stratagems used by “Them” against “Us”, etc. Where, pray tell, is the national body then in the midst of this mutual apprehension and distrust? How can a nation be built when its components do not think as a nation in the first place?

I write this only as an academic who constantly reminds his students that national identities are constructs that have to be sustained in the imaginary of individual subjects. As I have said countless times before, the trees and hills, rivers and valleys, roads and malls we see around us are not Malaysian: They have no consciousness and no awareness of what they are or even where they are. “Malaysia” is a construct that exists in us, Malaysians — and it is we, Malaysians, who bear the identity of the nation over time.

WE are Malaysia, and WE are the nation. But that can only come true if we genuinely think of ourselves as Malaysians and we are prepared to step beyond our comfort zones in order to recognise, defend and uphold the common citizenship we share with each and every other Malaysian citizen around us. Every Malaysian is a brother or sister to his/her fellow Malaysian; and as such the qualms we have about the poverty and injustice we see meted to our fellow citizens is a concern to all of us. We cannot continue to racialise poverty as if it was an ethnic concern of one group only; any more than ownership of the nation can be claimed by one segment of the populace.

I do not think I will live to see the day when this sense of collective, common and equal nationhood will ever be internalised and normalised in the country, frankly. So to go back to the ambassador’s question as to why I never gave up my citizenship; I can only put it down to a naive, childish faith that may well be blind as well. (I am only thankful that I do not have any children and am unlikely to have any at my age now, for I genuinely fear for the future and where the future may take them.)

But faith, however feeble and irrational, is still required to give birth to nations that are born out of the collective aspirations of many. I do not know how much longer I can keep up my work, or doing what I do — for time seems to be running out for me and the end of the road is nowhere in sight. But as the storm clouds gather as the geopolitical winds build up across our region; and as talk of clashes between the great and emerging powers grow louder by the day, I fear not for myself but rather for Malaysia as a whole.

Our politicians seem to have an attention span that lasts only up to the next by-election or general election; our public figures play the racial or religious card whenever it suits them. Our nation is sorely in need of a reminder that we are all on the same boat, and whether it sinks or swims, it will carry all of us whether we like it or not.

For the first time in my life, I feel genuine fear for the future — made all the worse by the apparent absence of political wisdom and leadership of any meaningful kind. And in the face of fear, all I can hold on to is faith; faith in the Malaysian project.

* Dr Farish A. Noor is a Senior Fellow at the Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Murtad, PAS & UMNO

Abdul Aziz Mustafa

KUALA LUMPUR, 10 Ogos: Lakonan Umno kononnya mahukan akta mencegah murtad langsung tidak boleh dipercayai kerana inisiatif mengenai perkara itu berkali-kali ditolak, kata Naib Presiden PAS, Salahuddin Ayub. "Saya bercakap mengenai pengalaman peribadi kerana dalam sidang Parlimen yang bermula pada Mac 2006, saya mengemukakan rang undang-undang persendirian yang dinamakan Rang Undang-Undang Murtad. "Rang undang-undang itu bukan sahaja tidak dipedulikan oleh ahli-ahli Parlimen Umno malah ditolak mentah-mentah," katanya. Selepas itu, kata Ahli Parlimen Kubang Kerian itu, sekali lagi beliau mengemukakan usul yang juga meminta Dewan Rakyat mewujudkan undang-undang mencegah murtad seperti meminda Perkara 11(1) Perlembagaan Persekutuan dengan memasukkan peruntukan yang jelas menghalang individu Islam daripada secara bebas mengisytiharkan diri keluar daripada agama Islam. "Usul itu juga tidak dipedulikan oleh kerajaan dan ahli-ahli Parlimen Umno," katanya Menurut Salahuddin, usaha yang dibawa oleh pihak PAS mengenai perkara itu dibuat berkali-kali selepas Presiden PAS sendiri, Datuk Seri Tuan Guru Abdul Hadi Awang selaku Ahli Parlimen Marang mengemukakan usul dan rang undang-undang persendirian untuk mencegah murtad. Pada 25 Mac 1988, Tuan Guru telah mengemukakan usul untuk membincangkan gejala murtad, tetapi ditolak. Selepas itu, pada 2 November 1999, Tuan Guru juga tidak dibenarkan membentang rang undang-undang ahli persendirian untuk mencegah murtad. "Penolakan usul dan rang undang-undang persendirian mengenai murtad yang berlaku berkali-kali itu membuktikan Umno langsung tidak berminat untuk mencegah jenayah syariah paling serius itu. "Sebab itulah umat Islam tidak seharusnya tertipu dengan gelagat gerombolan kuda tunggangan Umno yang kini nampak benar menunjuk-nunjuk kononnya mereka mahu mencegah murtad," tegas Salahuddin. Beliau juga berharap rakyat menolak lakonan dan permainan gerombolan kuda tunggangan Umno itu kerana mereka adalah hipokrit sebenar. "Amat hipokrit apabila bercakap hendak menentang gejala murtad tetapi pada masa yang sama menjadi kuda tunggangan Umno yang berkali-kali menolak usaha untuk mencegah murtad. "Menolak inisiatif dan usaha untuk menentang murtad melalui peruntukan undang-undang dan perlembagaan hakikatnya menentang dan memusuhi usaha mencegah jenayah syariah paling serius itu," kata Salahuddin. Beliau juga mempersoalkan di mana suara Umno ketika umat Islam bangkit menentang kes-kes murtad seperti kes Aishah Bukhari, Hartina Kamaruddin dan Lina Joy. "Malah Umno juga berdiam diri ketika umat Islam bertindak menentang pindaaan 121 (1A) Perlembagaan Persekutuan dan ketika 10 menteri dari Barisan Nasional bertindak mempertikaikan perkara 121 (1A) itu dengan tujuan untuk membunuh kuasa mahkamah Syariah serta membolehkan mahkamah sivil memansuhkan keputusan mahkamah Syariah," katanya. Dengan sejarah sedemikian, Salahuddin sekali lagi meminta umat Islam menolak hipokrit yang cuba berlagak hero yang kononnya memperjuangkan Islam dan kepentingan umat Islam.

Dream Car Ladder

Beginner cars (< RM100, 000):

Proton Persona ~ RM 50, 000



Proton Inspira ~ RM 80, 000

OR

Honda city ~ RM86, 000

Toyota Vios ~ RM80, 000

5-7 years later :

 

AUDI A4 ~ aprrox RM250 000

MERC C200 ~ approx RM260 000

BMW 3 series ~approx RM250, 000

BMW Price List


Land Rover Evoque ~  28, 000 pounds

Bila anak dah ramai sikit:




Proton Exora ~ RM80, 000



Mitsubishi Grandis ~ RM170, 000

Toyota Estima ~ Approx RM250, 000 

Nissan Murano ~ approx RM350, 000

Middle class sports cars?

BMW Z4 Roadster ~ Approx RM388, 000



Audi TT ~ Approx RM360, 000

Kalau dah kaya gila babeng!!

Maserati Grancabrio/Grantourismo ~ ??

Audi R8 ~ 1, 300, 000

Lambo Gallardo ~ RM1, 700, 000

Thinking again, the actual cars that I really desire are either a Merc/Audi/BMW/Evoque. So buying them 1st hand brings a special satisfaction insyaallah. Therefore, other cars in the ladder are possible to be owned at a more affordable price by buying used ones.